Thesis Review

Methodology

The methodology of this research involves a critical analysis of historical trajectories, political dynamics, and literary works to explore the concept of minor cosmopolitanism in the context of migration and globalization. The study delves into the historical evolution of political parties in Malabar, particularly the Muslim League and the Communist Party, to understand their coalitions and conflicts. It also examines the literary works of Vaikom Muhammad Basheer and CH Muhammad Koya to elucidate their perspectives on cosmopolitanism and cultural identity. Additionally, the research incorporates theoretical frameworks such as Lacan’s theory of mimicry to analyze political decision-making and the implications of assimilation versus separatism. The study employs a comparative analysis of Enlightenment ideologies and reactions of Jewish and Muslim writers to assimilation and separatism to explore the complexities of minority politics in the postcolonial context. The research also engages with debates on cosmopolitanism and minor cosmopolitanism to provide a theoretical foundation for understanding cultural identity and political agency amidst shifting global dynamics. The methodology of this research involves a multidisciplinary approach that integrates historical analysis, literary criticism, and theoretical frameworks to investigate the intersections of politics, culture, and identity in the context of migration and globalization.

Sources

The sources used in this research include works by Edward Said, historical narratives by Saidu Muhammad, Dale, Hussain, and Mandalankunnu, studies by Osella and Osella, and political writings by E.M.S. Nambudiripad. Additionally, the literary works of Vaikom Muhammad Basheer and CH Muhammad Koya are referenced in the analysis. The research also draws on theoretical frameworks such as Lacan’s theory of mimicry.

Chapter 2

In Chapter 2, author delves into various aspects of Kantian ethics, cosmopolitanism, and psychoanalytic perspectives, offering a rich tapestry of ideas and discussions. The chapter begins by exploring Kant’s belief in a universal history with a cosmopolitan purpose, emphasizing the realization of the moral man as the ultimate goal. It underscores Kant’s view that nature has a hidden plan to achieve peace through the development of human capacities, highlighting the significance of law, rights, and civil society in establishing a peaceful world order. Moving forward, the chapter introduces the concept of “minor cosmopolitanism” as a novel approach in a postcolonial context, shedding light on the evolving nature of cosmopolitan ideals in contemporary society. The text further delves into the relevance of Kant’s philosophy in the modern globalized world, emphasizing the importance of ethics and institutional arrangements in fostering ethical behavior and societal harmony. Moreover, the chapter delves into the intricate relationship between hospitality, forgiveness, and ethics, drawing on the insights of philosophers like Derrida, Levinas, and Fraser. It explores the complexities of cosmopolitanism and the need for a politics of singularities that transcends conventional legislative practices, advocating for a shift towards active governmental subjects and the cultivation of solidarities to build a more inclusive political community.

The text also engages with neo-Kantian perspectives on governance structures and civil society, offering a nuanced discussion on legal-institutional frameworks and the paradoxes inherent in liberal democracies. It critiques traditional cosmopolitanism, advocating for a more agonistic approach that embraces radical heterogeneity and un-belonging to foster true cosmopolitan ideals. Derrida’s notion of hospitality as an unconditional welcome to the stranger challenges traditional notions of hospitality as a reciprocal exchange, emphasizing the ethical imperative of opening oneself to the Other without expecting anything in return. Levinas, on the other hand, posits that the face-to-face encounter with the Other invokes a sense of responsibility and ethical obligation that transcends conventional moral frameworks. The ethical act, according to Levinas, is rooted in the recognition of the infinite Other and the acknowledgment of one’s own finitude, leading to a radical reorientation of subjectivity towards the Other. Fraser’s perspective on forgiveness as a political act also sheds light on the complexities of ethical behavior in a cosmopolitan context. Forgiveness, for Fraser, is not about absolving the Other of guilt but about acknowledging the irreparable harm and moving towards a future that is not predetermined by past grievances. It is a gesture of openness and reconciliation that challenges conventional notions of justice and retribution.

Furthermore, the chapter delves into the psychoanalytic perspective on Kant, duty, and the postcolonial state, highlighting the importance of desire as a driving force behind ethical actions and the forging of identities and alliances in a postcolonial context.

Chapter 3

This chapter delves into the concept of realism in literature, focusing on the works of Vaikom Muhammad Basheer. It explores how realism serves as a tool to accurately depict society and its characters, reflecting the societal shifts of the time. Basheer’s unique approach to realism is examined as a critique of nationalism from an internal perspective, challenging established beliefs and narratives. The chapter also discusses the performative aspect of realism in literature and its role in nation-building in India. Basheer’s unique approach to realism in literature has been a subject of much discussion and analysis. His works, such as “Balyakalasakhi,” have been praised for their ability to accurately depict society and its characters, reflecting the societal shifts of the time. Basheer’s writing style, characterized by simplicity and wit, has been lauded for its humorous yet realistic representation of Muslim life in mid-twentieth-century Kerala. His ability to blend humor with social commentary has made him a celebrated figure in Malayalam literature.

The chapter also delves into the performative aspect of realism in literature, highlighting its role in nation-building in India. Realism, as a literary tool, has been instrumental in providing a new mode of expression for urban experiences and establishing a mirror to life’s truths, thus contributing to the development of Indian nationalism. Basheer’s subversion of traditional realist norms and his critique of nationalism from within the grounds of nationalism itself offer a unique perspective on the complexities of identity and community formation.

The text further delves into Basheer’s novel “Balyakalasakhi,” highlighting its initial criticism and subsequent recognition as a masterpiece in Malayalam literature. It discusses Basheer’s status as a minority writer and his portrayal of Muslim characters, shedding light on themes of community formation, realism, and the challenges of mourning within his works. The chapter explores Basheer’s writing style, which is characterized by fabrication that disrupts conventional storytelling and societal norms. It delves into his views on religion and politics, emphasizing his bold assertion of his Muslim identity and critique of nationalism. Basheer’s use of irony and reticence in his writing is noted as a means to challenge established beliefs and narratives, reflecting his opposition to the idea of Pakistan and advocating for a homeland based on the Sufi concept of immanence and unity of Truth within the self.

The cyclical structures of Basheer’s novels, such as “Balyakalasakhi” and “Ntuppuppa,” are discussed in the context of loss, trauma, and the questioning of history and memory. These structures challenge unquestioned beliefs and myths that drive rationality and modernity, pointing to the communal nature of memory and the invention of histories by nation-states. The chapter touches upon the significance of the mole in Kunjupattumma’s story, exploring themes of identity, memory, and mourning in the modern cultural context. It draws parallels to Brechtian theater in discussing the circularity of Basheer’s novels and the inability to mourn, highlighting the dislodging of death as the ultimate tragedy. Basheer’s use of irony and reticence in his writing serves as a means to challenge established beliefs and narratives, reflecting his opposition to nationalist ideologies and advocating for a more inclusive and diverse representation of society. His portrayal of Muslim characters and communities in his works sheds light on the marginalized voices and experiences that are often overlooked in mainstream literature.

Basheer’s contribution to Indian literature goes beyond mere storytelling. His works serve as a critique of societal norms, a reflection of the complexities of identity and community, and a challenge to established beliefs and narratives. Through his unique blend of humor, realism, and social commentary, Basheer has left a lasting impact on Malayalam literature and continues to be celebrated as a pioneering figure in Indian literary history.

Chapter 4

The chapter delves into the multifaceted life and political career of CH Muhammad Koya, a significant figure in Muslim politics in Kerala. It intertwines his narrative with the genre of travel writing, exploring its implications within the contexts of imperialism and postcolonialism. The text emphasizes the subjective nature of travel narratives, highlighting the importance of understanding the traveler’s emotions and the transformation of self and others within these accounts. The chapter scrutinizes various modes of travel writing that challenge the pursuit of epistemological certainties, such as “slow travelling” and “bearing witness.” It specifically examines the evolution of travel writing in Malayalam literature, focusing on CH Muhammad Koya’s renowned travel narrative “Ente Hajj Yatra.” This narrative intricately weaves together the themes of pilgrimage, personal introspection, and a critical questioning of the genre it belongs to. The author reflects on their personal journey to Medina, contemplating the ethical and worldly considerations that influenced their visit to the Prophet’s Rauda. The discussion extends to the complexities of mourning in Islam, the unity among diverse religious groups during pilgrimage, and the politics of dignity, emphasizing the tangible manifestation of abstract concepts in real-world scenarios.

The text also critiques Chatterjee’s governmental logic within the Indian state, addressing issues such as the nature of the state, popular protests, reservations for OBCs, and the intricate dynamics of Kerala politics. It delves into the concept of impersonation in politics and the role of governmentality in postcolonial states, shedding light on the complexities of governance and power dynamics. The chapter explores the significance of travel for educational purposes and shrine visits, particularly focusing on the pilgrimage to Makkah. It delves into the historical and political importance of Makkah, as well as the establishment of the Malappuram district in Kerala as a means of asserting cultural identity and demands for concretization. The narrative also intertwines CH Muhammad Koya’s political trajectory and his influential role in shaping the Muslim League in Kerala.

The chapter discusses the collection of anecdotes in MBK, which offer moral guidance on Muslim statecraft and individual conduct in positions of power. These stories redefine the Kerala Muslim public, emphasizing individual agency and discretionary power over rationality. CH Muhammad Koya’s discursive universe is portrayed as a platform for individual achievement, drawing energy from a utopian past and transforming postcolonial state logic into a model for aspiring lawmakers. Furthermore, the chapter discusses the political implications of CH Muhammad Koya’s travel narratives, particularly in shaping the Muslim League in Kerala. His travel experiences and reflections on governance and statecraft, as depicted in anecdotes in MBK, offer insights into the moral and ethical considerations of leadership and power dynamics within the political landscape.

Chapter 5 and conclusion

The dissertation delves into the multifaceted impact of migration to the Persian Gulf on Malabar, focusing on the political ramifications and the emergence of minor cosmopolitanism in the region. It sheds light on the significant role played by various political entities such as the Muslim League, Solidarity Youth Movement, and Social Democratic Party of India in shaping the landscape of Muslim politics in Malabar. By analyzing the literary works of Vaikom Muhammad Basheer and CH Muhammad Koya, the dissertation explores how these authors grapple with the challenges posed by the postcolonial state and the erosion of community identity.

The chapter underscores the contrasting approaches taken by Basheer and Koya in envisioning communities and addressing the complexities of governance and cultural distinctiveness. Basheer’s works seem to reflect a more nuanced and perhaps nostalgic perspective on community identity, while Koya’s writings may offer a more pragmatic and forward-looking stance. Through this exploration, the dissertation not only provides insights into the evolving political and social dynamics in Malabar but also offers a deeper understanding of how literature can serve as a lens through which to examine and interpret complex societal changes

Bibliography

Agamben, Giorgio. 1993. The Coming Community, trans. Michael Hardt, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

Ahmad, Aijaz. 1987. “Jameson’s Rhetoric of Otherness and the ‘National Allegory'”, Social Text, 17. pp. 3–25.

Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.

Anjaria, Ulka. 2006. “Satire, Literary Realism and the Indian State: Six Acres and a Third and Raag Darbari”, Economic and Political Weekly, November 18. pp. 4795–4800.

——– 2012. Realism in the Twentieth-Century Indian Novel: Colonial Difference and Literary Form, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ansari, M.T. 2005. “Refiguring the Fanatic: Malabar 1836–1922” in Shail Mayaram, M.S.S. Pandian and Ajay Skaria (eds.) Subaltern Studies XII: Muslims, Dalits, and the Fabrications of History, Delhi: Permanent Black and Ravi Dayal Publisher.

Appadurai, Arjun. 1990. “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy”, Public Culture, Vol.2, No.2. pp. 1–24.

——– 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Ashcroft, Bill. 2009. “Afterword: Travel and Power” in Julia Kuehn and Paul Smethurst (eds.) Travel Writing, Form, and Empire, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 229–241.

Asher, R.E. 1998. “Balyakalasakhi-Victoria Oru Vichinthanam” trans. Dr. S. Velayudhan, in Paul Manalil (ed.) Pranayathinte Balyam: Basheerinte Balyakalasakhi Padanangal, Kottayam: Current Books. pp. 59–73.

Ashraf, E.M. 1999. Vaikkom Muhammad Basheer, Kottayam: DC Books.

Bakhtin, M.M. 1981. “The Epic and the Novel” in The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, Austin: University of Texas. pp. 4–40.

Balibar, Etienne. 2002. Politics and the Other Scene, London and New York: Verso.

Basheer, Vaikom Muhammad. 1980. “Me Grandad ‘ad an Elephant!” R.E. Asher and Achamma Coilparampil Chandrasekaran (trans.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University.

——– 1998. “Onnam Pathippinte Ormakal” in Paul Manalil (ed.) Pranayathinte Balyam: Basheerinte Balyakalasakhi Padanangal, Kottayam: Current Books. pp. 34–37.

——– 2008a [1951]. Ntuppuppakkoranandarnnu, Kottayam: DC Books.

——– 2008b [1951]. Mucheetukalikkarante Makal, Kottayam: DC Books.

——– 2009a [1969]. Nerum Nunayum, Kottayam: DC Books.

——– 2009b [1944]. Balyakalasakhi, Kottayam: DC Books.

——– 2009c [1959]. Pathummayude Aadu, Kottayam: DC Books.

——– 2009d [1955]. Anavariyum Ponkurishum, Kottayam: DC Books.

——– 2009e [1945]. “Anal Haq” in Anarghanimisham, Kottayam: DC Books. pp. 44–50.

——– 2009f [1992]. Cheviyorkkuka Anthimakahalam, Kottayam: DC Books.

——– 2011 [1953]. Sthalathe Pradhana Divyan, Kottayam: DC Books.

——– 2012 [2003]. “Ettukaali Mammonju” in Neelavelichavum Mattu Pradhana Kathakalum, Kottayam: DC Books.

——– 2013 [1981]. Ormayude Arakal, Kottayam: DC Books.

Benhabib, Seyla. 2006. Another Cosmopolitanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Benjamin, Walter. 1969. “The Storyteller” in Illuminations, New York: Schocken Books. pp. 83–110.

Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Bhabha, Homi. 1984. “Of Mimicry and Man: The Ambivalence of Colonial Discourse”, October, Vol. 28, Discipleship: A Special Issue on Psychoanalysis, Spring. pp. 125–133.

Braidotti, Rosi, Patrick Hanafin and Bolette Blaagaard (eds.) 2013. After Cosmopolitanism, New York: Routledge.

Brennan, Timothy. 2000. “The National Longing for Form” in Homi K. Bhabha (ed.) Nation and Narration, London and New York: Routledge. pp. 44–70.

Chatterjee, Partha. 1986. Nationalist Thought and the Colonial World: A Derivative Discourse, London: Zed Books.

Chouliaraki, Lilie. 2013. “Cosmopolitanism as Irony: A Critique of Post-Humanitarianism” in Rosi Braidotti, Patrick Hanafin and Bolette Blaagaard (eds.) After Cosmopolitanism, New York: Routledge. pp. 77–96.

Dale, Stephen F. 1980. The Mappilas of Malabar, 1498–1922: An Islamic Society on the South Asian Frontier, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Deleuze, Gilles, Felix Guattari and Robert Brinkley. 1983. “What Is a Minor Literature”, Mississippi Review, Vol.11, No.3, Winter/Spring, pp. 13–33.

Derrida, Jacques. 2001. On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness, trans. Mark Dooley and Michael Hughes. London and New York: Routledge.

Foucault, Michel. 1991. “Governmentality” in Graham Burchell et al. (eds.) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 87–104.

Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy”, Social Text, Duke University Press, 25 (26). pp. 56–80.

Freud, Sigmund. 1971 [1925]. “Mourning and Melancholia” trans. Joan Riviere, in Collected Papers, Vol. IV, London: The Hogarth Press, and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.

Giroux, Henry A. 2004. “Edward Said and the Politics of Worldliness: Towards a ‘Rendezvous of Victory'”, Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 339–349.

Gopal, Priyamvada. 2005. Literary Radicalism in India: Gender, Nation and the Transition to Independence, New York: Routledge.

Guru, Gopal. 2011. “The Idea of India: ‘Derivative, Desi and Beyond'”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 46, No. 37, September 10.

Hall, Stuart. 1991. “Old and New Identities, Old and New Ethnicities”, in A. King (ed.) Culture, Globalization and the World System, Basingstoke: Macmillan. pp. 41–68.

Jameson, Fredric. 1986. “Third World Literature in an Age of Multinational Capitalism”, Social Text, 15. pp. 65–88.

Kleingeld, Pauline. “Kant’s Changing Cosmopolitanism” in Amelie Oksenberg Rorty and James Schmidt (eds.) Kant’s Idea for Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 171–186.

Koshy, Susan. 2011. “Minority Cosmopolitanism”, PMLA, 126.3.

Kumar, Udaya. 2005. “The Ethics of Witnessing: Vaikom Muhammad Basheer and the Subject of Historical Narration” in I. Ramakrishnan (ed.) Narrating India: The Novel in Search of the Nation, New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi. pp. 305–328.

Kuttikkulam, Latheef. 2013. Ente Theranjedutha Niyamasabhaprasangangal, Kozhikode: Olive Books.

Laclau, Ernesto. 2000. “Constructing Universality” in Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau and Slavoj Zizek, Contingency, Hegemony, Universality, London and New York: Verso. pp. 281–307.

Levinas, Emmanuel. 1969. Totality and Infinity, Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

——– 1998. “Freedom and Command” in Collected Philosophical Papers, Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press. pp. 15–23.

Mansell, R., R. Samjive and A. Madhav (eds.) 2002. Networking Knowledge for Information Societies: Institutions and Interventions, Amsterdam: Delft University Press.

Meerakutty, P. 1998. Basheer: Kalathinte Kanal, Kottayam: Current Books.

Menon, Nivedita and Nigam, Aditya. 2007. “Globalization II: New Economies of Desire” in Power and Contestation: India Since 1989, Hyderabad: Orient Longman.

Miller, Jacques-Alain (ed.) 1977. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Book XI, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, trans. Alan Sheridan, New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.

Mufti, Aamir R. 2007. Enlightenment in the Colony: The Jewish Question and the Crisis of Postcolonial Culture, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Muhammad, U. 2007. Educational Empowerment of Kerala Muslims: A Socio-historical Perspective, New Delhi: Indian Council of Historical Research.

Neelarmadam, Thomas. 1998. “Mararude Vimarshanavum Krishnan Nairude Kumbasaravum” in Paul Manalil (ed.) Pranayathinte Balyam: Basheerinte Balyakalasakhi Padanangal, Kottayam: Current Books. pp. 107–112.

Poduval, Satish. 2002. Historical Narratives and Imagined Regions: A Study of Territorial Design in Indian Nationalism, unpublished PhD Dissertation, CIEFL.

Ramakrishnan, E.V. 2010. “Representing Community: A Reading of Vaikom Muhammad Basheer’s Novels” in M.T. Ansari and Deeptha Achar (eds.) Discourse, Democracy and Difference: Perspectives on Community, Politics and Culture, New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi. pp. 136–151.

Said, Edward. 1975a. “The Text, the World, the Critic”, The Bulletin of the Midwest Modern Language Association, Vol. 8, No. 2, Autumn. pp. 1–23.

Shafeeq K., Mohamed. 2014. “Reading the Malappuram Debate: Postcolonial State and the Ethics of Place”, SubVersions, Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 88–104.

Singha, Radhika. 2013. “The Great War and a ‘Proper’ Passport for the Colony: Border Crossing in British India, c. 1882–1922”, Indian Economic & Social History Review, July, 50, pp. 289–315.

Tharu, Susie. 2000 [1998]. “Citizenship and Its Discontents” in Janaki Nair (ed.) A Question of Silence: The Sexual Economies of Modern India, London: Zed Books. pp. 216–242.

Waldron, Jeremy. 1995. “Minority Cultures and the Cosmopolitan Alternative” in Will Kymlicka (ed.) The Rights of Minority Cultures, Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 93–119.